Jamie Alberto Ibarra v. State
This text of Jamie Alberto Ibarra v. State (Jamie Alberto Ibarra v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 17, 2013.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-12-01152-CR NO. 14-12-01153-CR
JAMIE ALBERTO IBARRA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 174th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1287084 and 1287085
MEMORANDUM OPINION
These attempted appeals are from the denial of motions to recuse. Procedures for recusal and disqualification found in the civil rules are applicable to criminal cases. Arnold v. State, 853 S.W.2d 543, 544 (Tex. Crim. App.1993); and Soderman v. State, 915 S.W.2d 605, (Tex. App. -- Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, pet. ref’d). An order denying a motion to recuse may be reviewed only for abuse of discretion on appeal from the final conviction. See Moorhead v. State, 972 S.W.2d 93, 94 -95 (Tex. App. -- Texarkana 1998, no pet.); Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(j)(1)(A).
Accordingly, the appeals are ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Busby. Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jamie Alberto Ibarra v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamie-alberto-ibarra-v-state-texapp-2013.