Jamie Alberto Ibarra v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 17, 2013
Docket14-12-01152-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jamie Alberto Ibarra v. State (Jamie Alberto Ibarra v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jamie Alberto Ibarra v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 17, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-01152-CR NO. 14-12-01153-CR

JAMIE ALBERTO IBARRA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1287084 and 1287085

MEMORANDUM OPINION

These attempted appeals are from the denial of motions to recuse. Procedures for recusal and disqualification found in the civil rules are applicable to criminal cases. Arnold v. State, 853 S.W.2d 543, 544 (Tex. Crim. App.1993); and Soderman v. State, 915 S.W.2d 605, (Tex. App. -- Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, pet. ref’d). An order denying a motion to recuse may be reviewed only for abuse of discretion on appeal from the final conviction. See Moorhead v. State, 972 S.W.2d 93, 94 -95 (Tex. App. -- Texarkana 1998, no pet.); Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(j)(1)(A).

Accordingly, the appeals are ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Busby. Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moorhead v. State of Texas
972 S.W.2d 93 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Arnold v. State
853 S.W.2d 543 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Soderman v. State
915 S.W.2d 605 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jamie Alberto Ibarra v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamie-alberto-ibarra-v-state-texapp-2013.