Jamichael S. Tribue v. State of Florida

274 So. 3d 1177
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 7, 2019
Docket17-5028
StatusPublished

This text of 274 So. 3d 1177 (Jamichael S. Tribue v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jamichael S. Tribue v. State of Florida, 274 So. 3d 1177 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-5028 _____________________________

JAMICHAEL S. TRIBUE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County. Stewart E. Parsons, Judge.

June 7, 2019

BILBREY, J.

Jamichael S. Tribue was placed on probation following a no contest plea to burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. Adjudication of guilt was withheld. He violated probation and was then restored to probation. He was again alleged to have violated probation. Following a hearing, the trial court orally revoked Tribue’s probation after he was found to have committed a new violation of law. Tribue appeals the judgment and sentence.

Tribue’s appointed counsel was unable to make a good faith argument that error occurred and filed an Anders * brief. We have reviewed the record and find there is competent, substantial

* Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). evidence supporting the trial court’s determination that Tribue violated probation. However, as Tribue’s counsel has noted, there is no written order of probation. Further, the judgment of conviction subsequently entered, which adjudicated Tribue guilty of the underlying offenses, incorrectly lists the burglary conviction as burglary of a dwelling while armed rather than burglary of a dwelling. Therefore, this judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for the trial court to enter a corrected judgment and a written order of revocation of probation. Appellant need not be present for entry of the corrected judgment or the written order of revocation.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

RAY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Michael J. Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 So. 3d 1177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamichael-s-tribue-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.