Jamestown Girls Club, Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jamestown Girls Club, Inc. v. State

57 A.D.2d 1049, 395 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12354

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 1977

DocketClaim No. 54774

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 A.D.2d 1049 (Jamestown Girls Club, Inc. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jamestown Girls Club, Inc. v. State, 57 A.D.2d 1049, 395 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: On this appeal the State questions only the before value adopted by the trial court and the comparability of the market data which the court accepted in determining before value. The dispute relates to the size of the comparables and the topography of the subject property, part of which consisted of "ravines” or "gullies”. The State contends that it was improper to value the entire parcel by using residential comparables of smaller size. The trial court made appropriate size adjustments to the comparables and viewed the subject to familiarize itself with the topography. Under the circumstances, comparability was solely a question of fact. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims — appropriation.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: On this appeal the State questions only the before value adopted by the trial court and the comparability of the market data which the court accepted in determining before value. The dispute relates to the size of the comparables and the topography of the subject property, part of which consisted of "ravines” or "gullies”. The State contends that it was improper to value the entire parcel by using residential comparables of smaller size. The trial court made appropriate size adjustments to the comparables and viewed the subject to familiarize itself with the topography. Under the circumstances, comparability was solely a question of fact. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims — appropriation.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 1049, 395 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamestown-girls-club-inc-v-state-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack