Jameson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jameson v. State

193 S.W.3d 810, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 868, 2006 WL 1675320

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 20, 2006·No. No. WD 65642·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrence Lee Jameson appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrence Lee Jameson appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Jameson v. State, 193 S.W.3d 810, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 868, 2006 WL 1675320 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

193 S.W.3d 810 (Jameson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.