Jameson v. Brinkley
265 A.2d 66, 158 Conn. 625
Opinion
The charge failed to distinguish between an admission and an inconsistent statement. Sears v. Curtis, 147 Conn. 311, 315, 160 A.2d 742.
There is error, the judgment is set aside and a new trial is ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jameson v. Brinkley, 265 A.2d 66, 158 Conn. 625 (Colo. 1969).
265 A.2d 66 (Jameson v. Brinkley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sears v. Curtis
160 A.2d 742 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1960)