Jameson v. Brinkley
265 A.2d 66, 158 Conn. 625
This text of 265 A.2d 66 (Jameson v. Brinkley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jameson v. Brinkley, 265 A.2d 66, 158 Conn. 625 (Colo. 1969).
Opinion
The charge failed to distinguish between an admission and an inconsistent statement. Sears v. Curtis, 147 Conn. 311, 315, 160 A.2d 742.
There is error, the judgment is set aside and a new trial is ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sears v. Curtis
160 A.2d 742 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1960)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
265 A.2d 66, 158 Conn. 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jameson-v-brinkley-conn-1969.