Jamesgaard v. Bayers
This text of 180 N.W. 927 (Jamesgaard v. Bayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action to rescind a contract for the exchange of real properties on the ground of fraudulent representations by defendant. The trial was before the court without a jury, and among other things the court found as á fact that no fraudulent representations were made by defendant, and as conclusions of law ordered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed from the judgment entered after an order denying a new trial. The only question presented is whether the findings of the court in the respect stated are sustained by the evidence. After a careful reading of the record we answer the question in the affirmative; the evidence fully supports the conclusion that the transaction was free from fraud or misrepresentation. The assignment of error challenging a ruling of the trial court in the exclusion -of evidence is without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 N.W. 927, 148 Minn. 476, 1921 Minn. LEXIS 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamesgaard-v-bayers-minn-1921.