James Wright v. United States

195 F.2d 208, 89 U.S. App. D.C. 410, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2366
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJuly 5, 1951
Docket10966_1
StatusPublished

This text of 195 F.2d 208 (James Wright v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Wright v. United States, 195 F.2d 208, 89 U.S. App. D.C. 410, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2366 (D.C. Cir. 1951).

Opinion

195 F.2d 208

89 U.S.App.D.C. 410

James WRIGHT, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 10966.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued June 20, 1951.
Decided July 5, 1951.

Carl L. Shipley, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Joseph F. Goetten, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty., and Joseph A. Sommer and Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before PRETTYMAN, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We find in this record no error affecting substantial rights of the appellant. The judgment of the District Court is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. United States
195 F.2d 208 (D.C. Circuit, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 F.2d 208, 89 U.S. App. D.C. 410, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-wright-v-united-states-cadc-1951.