James Wortham, Jr. v. Midge Carroll

Ninth Circuit

James Wortham, Jr. v. Midge Carroll

951 F.2d 365, 1991 WL 276449

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 23, 1991

Docket90-15764

StatusUnpublished

This text of 951 F.2d 365 (James Wortham, Jr. v. Midge Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Wortham, Jr. v. Midge Carroll, 951 F.2d 365, 1991 WL 276449 (9th Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

951 F.2d 365

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
James WORTHAM, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Midge CARROLL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 90-15764.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 9, 1991.*
Decided Dec. 23, 1991.

Before HUG, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER**

For the reasons set forth by the District Court in its decision of April 30, 1990, we AFFIRM.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and 9th Circ.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI