James Wolf v. Hoene Ridge Subdivision

Eighth Circuit

James Wolf v. Hoene Ridge Subdivision

669 F. App'x 345

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 14, 2016

Docket16-1143

StatusUnpublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 669 F. App'x 345 (James Wolf v. Hoene Ridge Subdivision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Wolf v. Hoene Ridge Subdivision, 669 F. App'x 345 (8th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Eugene Wolf appeals the district court’s 1 brder dismissing his claims under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 844, and 1961 et seq.\ and 42 U.S.C. §§ 3631 and 12101 et seq. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

A careful review of the record reveals that Wolf is not entitled to relief for the reasons stated by the district court. The motion to strike appellees’ brief is denied.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI