James Wimbley v. William F. Bolger, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service

831 F.2d 298, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13683, 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1184, 1987 WL 38643
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 9, 1987
Docket86-5898
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 831 F.2d 298 (James Wimbley v. William F. Bolger, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Wimbley v. William F. Bolger, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, 831 F.2d 298, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13683, 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1184, 1987 WL 38643 (6th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

831 F.2d 298

52 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1184

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
James WIMBLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William F. BOLGER, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 86-5898.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 9, 1987.

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, KEITH and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon consideration of this pro se plaintiff's appeal from the district court's dismissal of his handicap discrimination suit and from the dismissal of his appeal of an MSPB ruling affirming his discharge from employment at the United States Postal Service. Upon review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of the district court filed June 9, 1986, and reported at 642 F.Supp. 481, the district court's final order dismissing plaintiff's handicap discrimination suit is hereby affirmed. Further, for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of the district court filed November 18, 1985, the district court's order affirming the decision of the MSPB is also hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pannoni v. Board of Trustees, Browning School District No. 9
2004 MT 130 (Montana Supreme Court, 2004)
Hypes v. First Commerce Corp.
3 F. Supp. 2d 712 (E.D. Louisiana, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
831 F.2d 298, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13683, 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1184, 1987 WL 38643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-wimbley-v-william-f-bolger-postmaster-general-us-postal-service-ca6-1987.