James Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 21, 2021·No. 13-20-00345-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-20-00345-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

JAMES WILLIAMS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 178th District Court of Harris County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Appellant, James Williams, attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated

assault entered in the 178th District Court of Harris County 1. On June 10, 2020, the trial

court sentenced appellant. On July 16, 2020, appellant filed a notice of appeal. On August

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston, pursuant to docket equalization order Misc. Docket No. 20-9090 issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. 20, 2020, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared the appeal was not

timely perfected. Appellant was further informed the appeal would be dismissed if the

defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court’s directive.

Furthermore, on August 25, 2020, this Court notified appellant’s counsel that the

trial court’s certification indicated the appellant waived his right to appeal and ordered

counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal;

and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a

right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended

certification.

On September 25, 2020, counsel filed a brief with this Court. The brief does not

establish: (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect, or (2) that

appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

provides that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show

that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P.

37.1, 44.3, 44.4.

Furthermore, this Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a

timely filed notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

Absent a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to

address the merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal

for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION and the

motion to withdraw is DISMISSED as moot.

2 JAIME TIJERINA Justice

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 21st day of January, 2021.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Williams v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

James Williams v. State (James Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)