James William Utzman v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 21, 2017·No. 06-17-00144-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-17-00144-CR

JAMES WILLIAM UTZMAN, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 46,051-B

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

ORDER

Our review of the reporter’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as

that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). Volume five of the reporter’s record includes a social security number. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because volume five of the reporter’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal volume five of the electronically filed reporter’s record in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: November 21, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James William Utzman v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

James William Utzman v. State (James William Utzman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.