James William Collins v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden

381 F.2d 731
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 15, 1967
Docket21605
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 381 F.2d 731 (James William Collins v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James William Collins v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden, 381 F.2d 731 (9th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appeal in this case is frivolous. Collins sues the Warden of San Quentin Prison, where he is an inmate, and the prison accountant, under the Civil Rights Act. He claims $50,000 damages because his opposition to an extension of time to file a brief, requested by the California *732 Attorney General in Collins’ pending appeal to this court in habeas corpus, 1 was delayed in mailing for five days. This court granted the extension on March 25, 1966, the day on which Collins’ opposition would have been mailed had there been no delay. Moreover, when the extension was granted, we had before us Collins’ motion to hold the appellee in the habeas corpus case in default because his brief had not been filed in time, and we denied that motion on April 4, 1966. In short, Collins’ contentions were brought to the attention of this court and were ruled upon. The delay in mailing caused Collins no legally cognizable damages.

Affirmed.

1

. Collins v. Wilson, 9 Cir., 1966, 368 F.2d 995.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chinchello v. Fenton
763 F. Supp. 793 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1991)
Pickett v. Schaefer
503 F. Supp. 27 (S.D. New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
381 F.2d 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-william-collins-v-lawrence-e-wilson-warden-ca9-1967.