James Widtfeldt v. Kay Ponte

504 F. App'x 549
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 8, 2013
Docket12-3227
StatusUnpublished

This text of 504 F. App'x 549 (James Widtfeldt v. Kay Ponte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Widtfeldt v. Kay Ponte, 504 F. App'x 549 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

*550 PER CURIAM.

James Widtfeldt appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his civil complaint seeking injunctive relief against taxation officials and the United States. After careful de novo review of the record, see Pagonis v. United States, 575 F.3d 809, 812 (8th Cir.2009), and having considered the parties’ submissions on appeal, we agree with the district court that, under the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U.S.C. § 7421(a), Widtfeldt is prohibited from bringing this action.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pagonis v. United States
575 F.3d 809 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
504 F. App'x 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-widtfeldt-v-kay-ponte-ca8-2013.