James Widtfeldt v. James Daugherty

587 F. App'x 992
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 16, 2014·No. 14-1907·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Widtfeldt appeals the district court’s 1 without-prejudice dismissal of his pro se civil action for failure to prosecute. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action without prejudice, because Widtfeldt failed to establish that he had properly effectuated service against defendants within 120 days after filing his complaint. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m); Bullock v. United States, 160 F.3d 441, 442 (8th Cir.1998) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Widtfeldt v. James Daugherty, 587 F. App'x 992 (8th Cir. 2014).

587 F. App'x 992 (James Widtfeldt v. James Daugherty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
E.D. Missouri, 2026
Untitled Case
E.D. Missouri, 2026
Hamm's Frontier Marine LLC
E.D. Missouri, 2025