James Whittaker v. U S Mail Service
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 15, 2011.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-11-00725-CV
JAMES E. WHITTAKER, Appellant
V.
U.S. MAIL SERVICE, Appellee
On Appeal from the 157th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2010-79000
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 3, 2010, appellant filed an original petition concerning his claim for identification theft. The record indicates that on July 1, 2011, the trial court signed an order granting appellant’s pauper’s oath. On August 22, 2011, appellant filed a “Motion to Appeal” in this case, and the appeal was assigned to this court. The clerk’s record was filed October 20, 2011. It does not appear that appellant’s case has gone to trial, and the clerk’s record does not contain an appealable order. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).
Interlocutory orders may be appealed only if permitted by statute. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
On October 21, 2011, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal on or before November 1, 2011. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed no response.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adele Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James Whittaker v. U S Mail Service (James Whittaker v. U S Mail Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.