James Whitney v. DOJ
This text of James Whitney v. DOJ (James Whitney v. DOJ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-1338 ___________________________
James E. Whitney, ADC #163817
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
United States Department of Justice
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________
Submitted: December 21, 2018 Filed: January 25, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
James E. Whitney appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment to the United States Department of Justice in his pro se Freedom of Information Act
1 The Honorable D. P. Marshall, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. (FOIA) action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no error in the district court’s decision. See Miller v. U.S. Dep’t of State, 779 F.2d 1378, 1382 (8th Cir. 1985) (in FOIA cases, grant of summary judgment is appropriate where “the agency proves that is has fully discharged its obligations under FOIA, after the underlying facts and inferences to be drawn from them are construed in the light most favorable to the FOIA requester”). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Whitney v. DOJ, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-whitney-v-doj-ca8-2019.