James White, Jr. v. C.M. Creecy Randy Lee Danny Thompson Frank Evans

948 F.2d 1284, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31884, 1991 WL 237899
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 18, 1991
Docket91-7292
StatusUnpublished

This text of 948 F.2d 1284 (James White, Jr. v. C.M. Creecy Randy Lee Danny Thompson Frank Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James White, Jr. v. C.M. Creecy Randy Lee Danny Thompson Frank Evans, 948 F.2d 1284, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31884, 1991 WL 237899 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

948 F.2d 1284

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James WHITE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.M. CREECY; Randy Lee; Danny Thompson; Frank Evans,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7292.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 28, 1991.
Decided Nov. 18, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-90-164-CRT-BO)

James White, Jr., appellant pro se.

Jane Ray Garvey, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, SPROUSE, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

James White, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. White v. Creecy, No. CA-90-164-CRT-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
948 F.2d 1284, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31884, 1991 WL 237899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-white-jr-v-cm-creecy-randy-lee-danny-thompso-ca4-1991.