James Welch v. State of Florida Julie L. Jones, Secretary etc.

245 So. 3d 862
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2018
Docket17-1603
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 So. 3d 862 (James Welch v. State of Florida Julie L. Jones, Secretary etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Welch v. State of Florida Julie L. Jones, Secretary etc., 245 So. 3d 862 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-1603 _____________________________

JAMES WELCH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA; JULIE L. JONES, Secretary, Department of Corrections,

Appellees. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

February 20, 2018

B.L. THOMAS, C.J.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s order transferring his petition for writ of habeas corpus to the sentencing court, because the petition challenges Appellant’s judgment and/or sentence. Because Appellant’s petition is a time-barred collateral attack on his sentence, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand with instructions to dismiss.

In his petition for writ of habeas corpus, all of Appellant’s claims for relief were based on violations of his constitutional due process rights, and he summarized his petition by stating he was “denied his 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendment rights to due process of law and hearing before an impartial jury or fact finder.” Such claims must be made by motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

“The remedy of habeas corpus is not available in Florida to obtain the kind of collateral postconviction relief available by motion in the sentencing court pursuant to rule 3.850.” Baker v. State, 878 So. 3d 1236, 1245 (Fla. 2004). Dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus, rather than transfer, is appropriate when the petitioner seeks “the kind of collateral postconviction relief available through a motion filed in the sentencing court, and which (1) would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850 . . . .” Zuluaga v. State, Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 32 So. 3d 674, 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (quoting Baker, 878 So. 2d at 1246). Appellant’s sentence became final on December 9, 2010, and he filed his petition on March 7, 2017, long after the two-year window under rule 3.850 had closed. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order and remand with instructions to dismiss Appellant’s petition.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WOLF and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

James Welch, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Barbara Debelius Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee; Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GIVANNI TORRELL PARKS v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 So. 3d 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-welch-v-state-of-florida-julie-l-jones-secretary-etc-fladistctapp-2018.