James Warren Bright v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 29, 2003
Docket07-03-00079-CR
StatusPublished

This text of James Warren Bright v. State (James Warren Bright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Warren Bright v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

NO. 07-03-0079-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS



FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



AT AMARILLO



PANEL E



MAY 29, 2003



______________________________



JAMES WARREN BRIGHT, APPELLANT



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE



_________________________________



FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;



NO. 16,336; HONORABLE CECIL PURYEAR, JUDGE



_______________________________



Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ., and BOYD, S.J. (1)

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

In this proceeding, appellant James Warren Bright is attempting to appeal the refusal of the trial court to appoint an attorney to represent him in his application for forensic DNA testing as provided in Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

We have nothing in the record before us other than appellant's application for extension of time within which to file an appellate brief and a clerk's record. We have requested a response from the State and have received a reply stating that it is not opposed to appellant receiving a clerk's record as an indigent.

This state of the record requires us to abate the appeal and remand the proceedings to the trial court to determine:

1. Whether appellant is indigent and is entitled to the furnishing of a clerk's record showing what previous hearings took place in the trial court, as well as the appointment of an attorney as provided in Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.



2. If testimony was taken at the hearing giving rise to appellant's appeal, whether appellant is indigent and is entitled to the preparation of a reporter's record.

3. If other orders are necessary to ensure the diligent and prompt pursuit of appellant's appeal, and if so, to enter any such orders.



In support of its determination, the trial court shall prepare and file conclusions of law and, if appropriate, findings of fact and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. If testimony is taken, it shall be transcribed and included in a reporter's record. Those supplemental records shall be submitted to this court not later than June 30, 2003.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

1. John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2003).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 75.002
Texas GV § 75.002(a)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Warren Bright v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-warren-bright-v-state-texapp-2003.