James W. Moyle

17 P. 698, 75 Cal. 595, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 591
California Supreme Court·Decided April 21, 1888·No. No. 11906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McFarland, J.

This case is now before us upon a a motion to dismiss the appeal as to the respondent Michael Landers, and his legal representatives.

Upon an examination of the papers, we find that there were several defendants in the court below, and that they all appeared by the same attorney of record. Judgment went for defendants; and in due time plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal, and served it on the said attorney of record, who accepted service for all the defendants. As a matter of fact, however, the defendant Michael Landers had died between the entry of .the judgment and the service of the notice of appeal,—this fact being unknown to plaintiffs or their attorney. And this motion is based on the ground that the service of the notice of appeal was void, because at the time of the service the said Landers was dead; and it is made by the same attorney who accepted the service.

[596] In such a case this court will not entertain a motion to dismiss the appeal made by the attorney who accepted service for the dead man. The motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice.

Searls, C. J., Paterson, J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James W. Moyle, 17 P. 698, 75 Cal. 595, 1888 Cal. LEXIS 591 (Cal. 1888).

17 P. 698 (James W. Moyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Link v. Reeves
88 N.W. 670 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1902)