James W. Hughes Corp. v. State

New York State Court of Claims

James W. Hughes Corp. v. State

199 Misc. 979, 105 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1886

CourtNew York Court of Claims

DecidedJune 8, 1951

DocketClaim No. 30339

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 Misc. 979 (James W. Hughes Corp. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James W. Hughes Corp. v. State, 199 Misc. 979, 105 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1886 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Sylvester, J.

This claim, filed pursuant to an enabling act (L. 1950, ch. 792), is brought to recover damages arising from the State’s appropriation of a temporary easement in claimant’s land, in connection with certain grade crossing elimination work in Staten Island, for the purpose of maintaining a railroad detour.

Claimant’s plot of land, approximately 106,428 sq. ft. in size and bounded by the railroad right of way on its north, was affected by the taking in that a temporary easement was appropriated in the middle portion thereof (23,307 sq. ft), leaving a strip of land (25,629 sq. ft.) to the north of the easement and the remainder (57,492 sq. ft.) to the south. The State has occupied the area for the past nine years and two months and is still in possession.

In arriving at the value of the temporary easement, it is determined that the measure of compensation is the fair and [980]*980reasonable rental value of the property during the easement period. (United States v. General Motors Corp., 323 U. S. 373; Spencer v. State of New York, 206 App. Div. 376; Graham v. State of New York, 51 N. Y. S. 2d 437.) Claimant likewise seeks consequential damages to the remainder. An award is made to it in the accompanying findings solely for the diminished rental value during the easement period. Interest is also allowed commencing at the end of each year period.

During the State’s occupancy of the easement site, the railroad removed fill for the purpose of levelling the area for use as a railroad detour. Claimant seeks recovery in damages for the value of the earth removed as an item of permanent damage. However, the railroad asserts the removal was temporary and that replacement will be made at the termination of the temporary easement. Accordingly, no award can be made at this time for the temporary removal. This operates without prejudice to any claim therefor at the end of the occupancy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sylvester, J.

This claim, filed pursuant to an enabling act (L. 1950, ch. 792), is brought to recover damages arising from the State’s appropriation of a temporary easement in claimant’s land, in connection with certain grade crossing elimination work in Staten Island, for the purpose of maintaining a railroad detour.

Claimant’s plot of land, approximately 106,428 sq. ft. in size and bounded by the railroad right of way on its north, was affected by the taking in that a temporary easement was appropriated in the middle portion thereof (23,307 sq. ft), leaving a strip of land (25,629 sq. ft.) to the north of the easement and the remainder (57,492 sq. ft.) to the south. The State has occupied the area for the past nine years and two months and is still in possession.

In arriving at the value of the temporary easement, it is determined that the measure of compensation is the fair and [980]*980reasonable rental value of the property during the easement period. (United States v. General Motors Corp., 323 U. S. 373; Spencer v. State of New York, 206 App. Div. 376; Graham v. State of New York, 51 N. Y. S. 2d 437.) Claimant likewise seeks consequential damages to the remainder. An award is made to it in the accompanying findings solely for the diminished rental value during the easement period. Interest is also allowed commencing at the end of each year period.

During the State’s occupancy of the easement site, the railroad removed fill for the purpose of levelling the area for use as a railroad detour. Claimant seeks recovery in damages for the value of the earth removed as an item of permanent damage. However, the railroad asserts the removal was temporary and that replacement will be made at the termination of the temporary easement. Accordingly, no award can be made at this time for the temporary removal. This operates without prejudice to any claim therefor at the end of the occupancy.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 Misc. 979, 105 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-w-hughes-corp-v-state-nyclaimsct-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack