James W. Howder v. Isbrandtsen Company, Inc.

Second Circuit

James W. Howder v. Isbrandtsen Company, Inc.

179 F.2d 964

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedFebruary 16, 1950

Docket21431

StatusPublished

This text of 179 F.2d 964 (James W. Howder v. Isbrandtsen Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James W. Howder v. Isbrandtsen Company, Inc., 179 F.2d 964 (2d Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

179 F.2d 964

James W. HOWDER, Appellant,
v.
ISBRANDTSEN COMPANY, Inc., Appellee.

No. 65, Docket 21431.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 30, 1950.
Decided Feb. 16, 1950.

Samuel Morris, New York City, for appellant.

Xavier N. Sardaro, New York City, Corydon B. Dunham, New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the opinion below.1

1

No District Court opinion for publication

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

179 F.2d 964

James W. HOWDER, Appellant,
v.
ISBRANDTSEN COMPANY, Inc., Appellee.

No. 65, Docket 21431.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 30, 1950.
Decided Feb. 16, 1950.

Samuel Morris, New York City, for appellant.

Xavier N. Sardaro, New York City, Corydon B. Dunham, New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the opinion below.1

1

No District Court opinion for publication

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 F.2d 964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-w-howder-v-isbrandtsen-company-inc-ca2-1950.