James W. Hooley Metal Works v. Schwartz

Louisiana Court of Appeal

James W. Hooley Metal Works v. Schwartz

4 Pelt. 696

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 19, 1921

DocketNo. 8340

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Pelt. 696 (James W. Hooley Metal Works v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James W. Hooley Metal Works v. Schwartz, 4 Pelt. 696 (La. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

[697]*697COURT or iPPEAL, PiBISH OP OHISiHS.

HOLLEY METAL WORKS VS. GEORGE SCHWARTZ.

I IO.BH#)

s CODE! 07 APPEAL : PiBISH 07 OBLEiMS

On motion of GEQBSE SCHffABTZ, defendant and appollaat In the above entitled and numbered cause, throned Ms attorneys, Harriet: t Solwar* and Morris B. Bedmann, and on euggestlng to the Court that tha appeal harein was Inadvertently taken to this Court Instead of to tha Supreme court of the State of Louisiana, and on further suggesting that tMa Conrt Is without Jurisdiction rations matarlas, for the reason that the amount exceeds Two Thousand ($2,000.00) Dollars, and on further suggesting that mover desires to have this cause transferred to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, in accordance with the provisions of ist 19 of 1912s

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[697]*697COURT or iPPEAL, PiBISH OP OHISiHS.

HOLLEY METAL WORKS VS. GEORGE SCHWARTZ.

I IO.BH#)

s CODE! 07 APPEAL : PiBISH 07 OBLEiMS

On motion of GEQBSE SCHffABTZ, defendant and appollaat In the above entitled and numbered cause, throned Ms attorneys, Harriet: t Solwar* and Morris B. Bedmann, and on euggestlng to the Court that tha appeal harein was Inadvertently taken to this Court Instead of to tha Supreme court of the State of Louisiana, and on further suggesting that tMa Conrt Is without Jurisdiction rations matarlas, for the reason that the amount exceeds Two Thousand ($2,000.00) Dollars, and on further suggesting that mover desires to have this cause transferred to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, in accordance with the provisions of ist 19 of 1912s

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Pelt. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-w-hooley-metal-works-v-schwartz-lactapp-1921.