James W. Hawkins v. United States

D.C. Circuit

James W. Hawkins v. United States

302 F.2d 191, 112 U.S. App. D.C. 257, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5469

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 5, 1962

Docket16781

StatusPublished

This text of 302 F.2d 191 (James W. Hawkins v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James W. Hawkins v. United States, 302 F.2d 191, 112 U.S. App. D.C. 257, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5469 (D.C. Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a conviction of robbery. Counsel appointed by this court contend that certain evidence was erroneously admitted. Appellant’s trial counsel introduced this evidence. We think its admission should not, in the circumstances of this case, lead us to reverse the conviction by virtue of the plain error rule, F.R.Crim.P. [rule] 52 (b), 18 U.S.C.A.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a conviction of robbery. Counsel appointed by this court contend that certain evidence was erroneously admitted. Appellant’s trial counsel introduced this evidence. We think its admission should not, in the circumstances of this case, lead us to reverse the conviction by virtue of the plain error rule, F.R.Crim.P. [rule] 52 (b), 18 U.S.C.A.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 F.2d 191, 112 U.S. App. D.C. 257, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-w-hawkins-v-united-states-cadc-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack