James W. Elder v. United States

406 F.2d 398
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 1969
Docket21552
StatusPublished

This text of 406 F.2d 398 (James W. Elder v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James W. Elder v. United States, 406 F.2d 398 (9th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James W. Elder appeals from a judgment convicting him of a violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312 (1964). He presents three questions here, namely: (1) the instructions given to the jury, and the argument to the jury by the United States Attorney, on the matter of the inferences which may be drawn from proof of possession of property recently stolen was erroneous and deprived Elder of due process of law; (2) the evidence' was insufficient to support the verdict; and (3) Elder was denied his Sixth Amendment right to appointed counsel.

We have examined the facts and law with respect to each of these contentions and are satisfied that no error was committed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
406 F.2d 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-w-elder-v-united-states-ca9-1969.