James W. Corrington v. James E. Webb, Etc.
This text of 375 F.2d 298 (James W. Corrington v. James E. Webb, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant instituted this action in the district court seeking reinstatement to the Civil Service position from which he was removed, and back pay. The district court granted the government’s motion for summary judgment on the ground of laches, there being a thirty-four month delay between final removal of appellant from his position at the administrative level and the filing of the law suit to review that removal.
We find no abuse of discretion on the part of the district judge in the granting of the government’s motion for summary judgment on the ground of laches.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
375 F.2d 298, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-w-corrington-v-james-e-webb-etc-ca9-1967.