James v. Wormuth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

James v. Wormuth

93 A.D.3d 1290, 940 N.Y.S.2d 499

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 2012

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 93 A.D.3d 1290 (James v. Wormuth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Wormuth, 93 A.D.3d 1290, 940 N.Y.S.2d 499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Brian F. DeJoseph, J.), entered January 11, 2011 in a medical malpractice action. The order granted the motion of defendants at the close of plaintiffs proof to dismiss the amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435 [1989]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present — Scudder, PJ., Smith, Fahey, Garni and Sconiers, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Brian F. DeJoseph, J.), entered January 11, 2011 in a medical malpractice action. The order granted the motion of defendants at the close of plaintiffs proof to dismiss the amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435 [1989]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present — Scudder, PJ., Smith, Fahey, Garni and Sconiers, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A.D.3d 1290, 940 N.Y.S.2d 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-wormuth-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack