James v. Williams
This text of James v. Williams (James v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7082
TERRANCE LAMOUNT JAMES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RANDY WILLIAMS, Sergeant, in segregation employed at Marion; C. STURGILL, Assistant Unit Manager of segregation employed at Marion; LAWRENCE WILLIS; THEODORE BOSWORTH; WILLIAM STEVENS; KEITH TURNER; MICHAEL MARTIN; ROBERT FRADY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-69)
Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: October 4, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrance Lamount James, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Terrance Lamount James appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See James v.
Williams, No. CA-04-69 (W.D.N.C. June 21, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James v. Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-williams-ca4-2005.