James v. Vinson

Supreme Court of Georgia

James v. Vinson

260 S.E.2d 337, 244 Ga. 429, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1267

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 2, 1979

Docket35392

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 260 S.E.2d 337 (James v. Vinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Vinson, 260 S.E.2d 337, 244 Ga. 429, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1267 (Ga. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

The plaintiffs, in this suit for specific performance of an option contract for the sale of 94 acres of farmland, appeal a jury verdict in favor of the defendant. We affirm.

1. The verdict was not error under the evidence. The requested charge not given by the trial court was covered generally by the charge as given. Therefore, its refusal was not error.

2. Plaintiffs’ enumeration of error that the trial court erred in failing to grant summary judgment in their favor has been rendered moot by the subsequent jury trial. Drillers Service, Inc. v. Moody, 242 Ga. 123 (249 SE2d 607) (1978)\Dunlap v. Dunlap, 234 Ga. 304 (215 SE2d 674) (1975).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI