James v. United States

89 F. Supp. 330, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3976
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina
DecidedMarch 30, 1950
DocketCiv. No. 140
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 89 F. Supp. 330 (James v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. United States, 89 F. Supp. 330, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3976 (W.D.N.C. 1950).

Opinion

WARLICK, District Judge.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff as against the defendant to recover under the terms of a policy of life insurance on the life of Clara Fine James, in which policy the plaintiff was named as the principal beneficiary, — and came on for hearing and was heard upon the facts without a jury. From the hearing the court finds the following facts and makes the conclusions of law set out herein:

1. That the plaintiff, Coy William James, is a citizen of North Carolina and resides in Iredell County and was named as principal beneficiary in that said National Service Life Insurance policy No. N-12 505 287, issued on the life of Clara Fine James, deceased, wife of the plaintiff.

2. That Clara Fine enlisted in the United States Navy on March 29, 1943, and during her enlistment and more specifically on July 30, 1943, applied for and was granted the National Service Life Insurance certificate set out above in the sum of $10,-000.00.

3. That during the period of her enlistment the said Clara Fine became pregnant and on May 24, 1946 was discharged from the United States Navy as a result of her being five to six months in pregnancy and that from the evidence upon her discharge at the above time was in reasonably good health consistent with five to six months pregnancy, since the medical examiner at the time of her discharge made the following entry to the question as to whether the insured was fit to perform active duty, “No, due to pregnancy.”

4. That the premiums on the National Service Life Insurance policy were paid by deductions from the pay of the insured, Clara Fine, during her active service in [332]*332the Navy, and following her discharge no payments were made and the policy lapsed for the non-payment of premiums on July 1, 1946.

5. That following her discharge and at sometime prior to the 10th of June, 1947, said Clara Fine married the plaintiff, Coy William James, and on the said 10th day of June 1947 the said Clara Fine James made application to the Veterans’ Service Officer in Iredell County, North Carolina where she was then residing with her husband, for reinstatement of her lapsed policy of insurance and named on her application her husband, Coy William James, as the principal beneficiary, attaching her check in the sum of $16.60 for two months premiums as was required, and thereafter and up until the time of her death on December 18, 1947, sent payments of $8.30 each month to the Veterans’ Administration.

6. That the application for reinstatement as required by the government, contained a series of questions numbered consecutively and in answer to the question as to whether the applicant, Clara Fine James, was in as good health at the date of the application (June 10, 1947), as she was on the date of the lapse of the policy (July 1, 1946), inserted the answer, “Yes”; that said application blank contained other and additional questions, one being whether or not the applicant had been subsequent to the lapse of the policy, sick or under the care of a physician, or hospitalized, etc., and that the said Clara Fine James failed to make any answer to this question on the application blank, but elected to leave the question unanswered.

7. That on the 10th of June 1947 the date of application for reinstatement of the lapsed policy, the said Clara Fine James, in truth and in fact was not in as good health as she was on July 1, 1946, when the policy of insurance had lapsed for nonpayment of premiums and actually on said date of June 10, 1947 the said Clara Fine James was totally and permanently disabled by reason of granulosa cell carcinoma, a disability that is commonly known as cancer.

8. That on June 13, 1946 in Norfolk, Virginia, the deceased, Clara Fine James, was examined with respect to her pregnant condition by Doctor J. R. Kight and her condition thoroughly diagnosed and that such operation as was had was consistent with her condition and was successful, resulting in the delivery, though dead, of the child with which she was pregnant. That later on November 9, 1946, months after the lapse of the policy herein, the said insured was again examined by Dr. Kight at the hospital in Norfolk and no unusual circumstances or conditions were noted or found. That on April 1, 1947, and thereafter at Davis Hospital in Statesville, North Carolina, on an operation more specifically performed on April 9, 1947, large amounts of tissue were removed from the abdomen of Clara Fine James and this was diagnosed as granulosa cell carcinoma (cancer).

9. That on June 11, 1947 and just one day after the date of application for reinstatement of the National Service Life Insurance certificate, Dr. Forest C. Meade at Davis Hospital, Statesville, North Carolina, at the instance of the insured and following an examination of her, addressed a letter to the Veterans’ Administration, describing the cancer of which the said Clara Fine James then suffered, and that said letter as written by Dr. Meade and dated June 11, 1947, was attached to and accompanied the application then made by the said Qara Fine James for disability compensation, which said application was duly submitted to the Veterans’ Administration at Statesville on June 25, 1947, at a time fifteen days distant from the date of application for reinstatement of the policy of insurance.

10. That following the application for disability compensation and the accompanying data assembled by the Veterans’ Service Officer of Statesville, the whole thereof was on July 2, 1947, mailed to and was received by the Veterans’ Administration on July 7, 1947; that subsequently and on the evidence submitted, the Veterans’ Administration found that Clara Fine James was 100.% disabled and being such was entitled to 100% disability payments from [333]*333and after July 7, 1947, the date the application was actually received by the Veterans’ Administration.

11. That during the spring and summer of 1947 and for some time prior thereto the Veterans’ Administration was engaged in a concerted effort to get many lapsed policies of insurance held by ex-service men and women reinstated and due to the success of its efforts was overwhelmed with applications for reinstatement, and was considerably behind in the work of checking them through its records. That during the fall of 1947 said Clara Fine James requested the Veterans’ Administration to transfer her file from the Richmond Branch Office to the Boston Branch Office and that the transfer of said file as requested by the insured caused considerable delay in the normal course of handling her application for reinstatement of her National Service Life Insurance Policy.

12. That the failure of Clara Fine James on June 10, 1947 when she made application for reinstatement of her National Service Life Insurance Policy, intentionally or otherwise, to answer the question contained in the application blank for reinstatement, as to whether or not she had been sick or under the care of a physician since the lapse of her policy constituted a failure on her part to comply with a reasonable requirement of the Veterans’ Administration, properly made and requested, to enable it to then determine whether or not she constituted an insurable risk, and that her failure to answer the question asked of her in her application for reinstatement constituted a withholding on her part of evidence that the Veterans’ Administration would have been entitled to have from her.

13. That Clara Fine James died on December 18, 1947, from an incurable disease of cancer.

14.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. United States
122 F. Supp. 155 (E.D. North Carolina, 1954)
Moss v. United States
101 F. Supp. 692 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1951)
James v. United States
185 F.2d 115 (Fourth Circuit, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 F. Supp. 330, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-united-states-ncwd-1950.