James v. United States
This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 546 (James v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial, Government counsel read into the record a communication stating that it was agreed that the entry, as appraised, should have been liquidated on the basis of a value of $113 per metric ton, plus extras of $2 per metric ton. Counsel stated that the Government had no objection to granting the protest to the extent indicated in the communication and would be willing to so stipulate. Upon agreement of plaintiff, the case was submitted upon the stipulation read into the record. It was, therefore, held that duty should be assessed at the appropriate rate under paragraph 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on the basis of a value of $113 per metric ton, plus extras of $2 per metric ton.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 Cust. Ct. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-united-states-cusc-1957.