James v. United States

Sixth Circuit

James v. United States

16 F.2d 125, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3784

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 8, 1926·No. No. 4704·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed — as to proof of another offense, on authority of Moore v. U. S., 150 U. S. 57, 61, 14 S. Ct. 26, 37 L. Ed. 996; Tucker v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 224 F. 833, 840; De Witt v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 291 F. 995, 1002; as to variance affeeting the fourth count, on authority of Claassen v. U. S., 142 U. S. 140, 12 S. Ct. 169, 35 L. Ed. 966, and Bullock v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 289 F. 29, 31; as to restriction of cross-examination, because within the discretion of the trial judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed — as to proof of another offense, on authority of Moore v. U. S., 150 U. S. 57, 61, 14 S. Ct. 26, 37 L. Ed. 996; Tucker v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 224 F. 833, 840; De Witt v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 291 F. 995, 1002; as to variance affeeting the fourth count, on authority of Claassen v. U. S., 142 U. S. 140, 12 S. Ct. 169, 35 L. Ed. 966, and Bullock v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 289 F. 29, 31; as to restriction of cross-examination, because within the discretion of the trial judge.

James v. United States, 16 F.2d 125, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3784 (6th Cir. 1926).

Pincite

16 F.2d 125 (James v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related