James v. United States

Sixth Circuit

James v. United States

16 F.2d 125, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3784

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 8, 1926

DocketNo. 4704

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 F.2d 125 (James v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. United States, 16 F.2d 125, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3784 (6th Cir. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed — as to proof of another offense, on authority of Moore v. U. S., 150 U. S. 57, 61, 14 S. Ct. 26, 37 L. Ed. 996; Tucker v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 224 F. 833, 840; De Witt v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 291 F. 995, 1002; as to variance affeeting the fourth count, on authority of Claassen v. U. S., 142 U. S. 140, 12 S. Ct. 169, 35 L. Ed. 966, and Bullock v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 289 F. 29, 31; as to restriction of cross-examination, because within the discretion of the trial judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed — as to proof of another offense, on authority of Moore v. U. S., 150 U. S. 57, 61, 14 S. Ct. 26, 37 L. Ed. 996; Tucker v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 224 F. 833, 840; De Witt v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 291 F. 995, 1002; as to variance affeeting the fourth count, on authority of Claassen v. U. S., 142 U. S. 140, 12 S. Ct. 169, 35 L. Ed. 966, and Bullock v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 289 F. 29, 31; as to restriction of cross-examination, because within the discretion of the trial judge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 F.2d 125, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-united-states-ca6-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack