James v. United States

175 F.2d 769, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2424
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 25, 1949
DocketNo. 12692
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 175 F.2d 769 (James v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. United States, 175 F.2d 769, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2424 (5th Cir. 1949).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner proceeding under Section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C.A. as amended September 1, 1948, applied to the court of sentence for relief from his conviction and sentence.

Claiming that he was unconstitutionally convicted and sentenced, he alleged, among other things, that the United States Attorney and the Agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation knowingly and falsely procured and used perjured testimony. These allegations entitled him to be heard, and, if true, to relief.

The District Judge, stating, “None of the grounds stated constitute grounds enumerated in Title 28, Sec. 2255 for the correction of sentence”, denied the petition without a hearing. The invoked section provides:

“Unless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon the United States attorney, grant a prompt hearing thereon, determine the issues and make findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect thereto.”

Without in any manner expressing an opinion on the truth or merits of petitioner’s application, we think the court erred in denying the petition without a hearing and that the order appealed from should be reversed and the cause remanded for further and not inconsistent proceedings as provided in Sec. 2255.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilkinson v. United States
774 F. Supp. 1360 (N.D. Georgia, 1991)
Donald Allen Kiger v. United States
315 F.2d 778 (Seventh Circuit, 1963)
Robert Louis Porter v. United States
298 F.2d 461 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
Smith v. United States
141 F. Supp. 245 (S.D. Texas, 1956)
Ernest Eugene Taylor v. United States
229 F.2d 826 (Eighth Circuit, 1956)
United States v. Jerome A. Stevens
224 F.2d 866 (Third Circuit, 1955)
State v. Eaton
280 S.W.2d 63 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1955)
United States v. Rutkin
212 F.2d 641 (Third Circuit, 1954)
United States v. Kaplan
101 F. Supp. 7 (S.D. New York, 1951)
Howard v. United States
186 F.2d 778 (Sixth Circuit, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 F.2d 769, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-united-states-ca5-1949.