James v. United States
This text of 670 F. App'x 773 (James v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Samuel M. James appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for [774]*774the reasons stated by the district court. James v. United States, No. 3:14-cv-00827-REP, 2016 WL 1060251 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 10 & entered Mar. 11, 2016). We deny James’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 F. App'x 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-united-states-ca4-2016.