James v. United States

Fourth Circuit

James v. United States

670 F. App'x 773

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2016·No. No. 16-1547·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel M. James appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for [774] the reasons stated by the district court. James v. United States, No. 3:14-cv-00827-REP, 2016 WL 1060251 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 10 & entered Mar. 11, 2016). We deny James’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel M. James appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for [774] the reasons stated by the district court. James v. United States, No. 3:14-cv-00827-REP, 2016 WL 1060251 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 10 & entered Mar. 11, 2016). We deny James’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

James v. United States, 670 F. App'x 773 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 773 (James v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.