James v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

James v. Thompson

96 S.E. 333, 22 Ga. App. 450

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 9, 1918

Docket8686

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 S.E. 333 (James v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Thompson, 96 S.E. 333, 22 Ga. App. 450 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

1. Under the answers of the Supreme Court to questions certified by this court in this case, a justice of the peace acts as a judge of a special tribunal in passing upon such claims for damages ! as are included by the provisions of section -2034 of the Civil Code of 1910, in the manner therein provided; and, acting as a judge of such [451]*451special tribunal under the provisions of said section, he may give judgment for- damages where the damage complained of is to growing or immature crops. See 148 Ga. 201 (96 S. E. 216).

Decided July 9, 1918.

Certiorari; from Bibb superior court—Judge Mathews. March 9, 1917.

Charles Alcerman, for plaintiff in error. 8. W. Hatcher, contra.

2. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the motion to dismiss the case, or in holding that the justice had jurisdiction to entertain and try it as provided by section 2034, supra, and that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the judgment rendered.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, C. J.

1. Under the answers of the Supreme Court to questions certified by this court in this case, a justice of the peace acts as a judge of a special tribunal in passing upon such claims for damages ! as are included by the provisions of section -2034 of the Civil Code of 1910, in the manner therein provided; and, acting as a judge of such [451]*451special tribunal under the provisions of said section, he may give judgment for- damages where the damage complained of is to growing or immature crops. See 148 Ga. 201 (96 S. E. 216).

Decided July 9, 1918.

Certiorari; from Bibb superior court—Judge Mathews. March 9, 1917.

Charles Alcerman, for plaintiff in error. 8. W. Hatcher, contra.

2. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the motion to dismiss the case, or in holding that the justice had jurisdiction to entertain and try it as provided by section 2034, supra, and that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the judgment rendered.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 S.E. 333, 22 Ga. App. 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-thompson-gactapp-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack