James v. Theobald

609 So. 2d 657, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11498, 1992 WL 317838
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 3, 1992
DocketNo. 91-2206
StatusPublished

This text of 609 So. 2d 657 (James v. Theobald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Theobald, 609 So. 2d 657, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11498, 1992 WL 317838 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983); Farish v. Lum’s Inc., [658]*658267 So.2d 325 (Fla.1972); Herrick v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 512 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herrick v. Southeast Bank, NA
512 So. 2d 1029 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Farish v. Lum's, Inc.
267 So. 2d 325 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
Mercer v. Raine
443 So. 2d 944 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
609 So. 2d 657, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11498, 1992 WL 317838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-theobald-fladistctapp-1992.