James v. Tarlton
This text of 2 Ky. 126 (James v. Tarlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This day came the parties aforesaid, by their attorneys, and the appellee, by his attorney, moved the court to dismiss the appeal aforesaid, because the matter in contest is for a less sum of money than this court has jurisdiction of by way of appeal; whereupon, the parties being heard by their counsel, it is considered by the court that the appeal aforesaid be dismissed, and that the.appellee may proceed to have the benefit of the decree aforesaid and recover of the appellant ten per centum damages on the amount thereof, together with his costs in this behalf expended, which is ordered to be certified to the said court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Ky. 126, 1 Sneed 126, 1802 Ky. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-tarlton-kyctapp-1802.