James v. State

113 S.W.2d 557, 134 Tex. Crim. 42, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 186

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 Tex. Crim. 530 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 19, 1938·No. No. 19320.·Published

Opinions

Conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen property, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts is brought forward. It is impossible to appraise the relevancy of the refused special charges or the objections to the court's instructions in the absence of the evidence.

We discover no vice in the count of the indictment under which appellant was convicted.

The judgment is affirmed.

ON APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen property, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts is brought forward. It is impossible to appraise the relevancy of the refused special charges or the objections to the court's instructions in the absence of the evidence.

We discover no vice in the count of the indictment under which appellant was convicted.

The judgment is affirmed.

ON APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

James v. State, 113 S.W.2d 557, 134 Tex. Crim. 42, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 186 (Tex. 1938).

Pincite

113 S.W.2d 557 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Limbrick v. State

36 S.W.2d 1026 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)

State v. Earp

41 Tex. 487 (Texas Supreme Court, 1874)

Opinions

Related