James v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

James v. State

1922 OK CR 131, 208 P. 1055, 21 Okla. Crim. 402, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 274

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 11, 1922

DocketNo. A-3961.

StatusPublished

This text of 1922 OK CR 131 (James v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. State, 1922 OK CR 131, 208 P. 1055, 21 Okla. Crim. 402, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 274 (Okla. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Consie James was convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county .of the crime of rape in the first degree, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment ini the penitentiary for a term of 20 years.

This appeal has; been pending in this, court since the 13th day of April, 1921, the cause! having been submitted May 31, 1922, at which time no appearance was made by any counsel representing plaintiff in error, nor has any brief been filed in his behalf. Rule 9 of this court (12 Okla. Cir. viii, 165 Pac. x) provides:

“When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and, if no prejudicial error appears will affirm the judgment. ’ ’

While this appeal has evidently been abandoned, the court, for the reason that this is a conviction of a felony, with punishment fixed at 20 years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary, has taken) occasion !to examine also the transcript of the evidence, for the purpose of ascertaining if there is sufficient credible evidence in the record to sustain the verdict and judgment. An examination of the pleadings, instructions, and judgment and sentence discloses no prejudicial error, and we find the evidence sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Consie James was convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county .of the crime of rape in the first degree, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment ini the penitentiary for a term of 20 years.

This appeal has; been pending in this, court since the 13th day of April, 1921, the cause! having been submitted May 31, 1922, at which time no appearance was made by any counsel representing plaintiff in error, nor has any brief been filed in his behalf. Rule 9 of this court (12 Okla. Cir. viii, 165 Pac. x) provides:

“When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and, if no prejudicial error appears will affirm the judgment. ’ ’

While this appeal has evidently been abandoned, the court, for the reason that this is a conviction of a felony, with punishment fixed at 20 years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary, has taken) occasion !to examine also the transcript of the evidence, for the purpose of ascertaining if there is sufficient credible evidence in the record to sustain the verdict and judgment. An examination of the pleadings, instructions, and judgment and sentence discloses no prejudicial error, and we find the evidence sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1922 OK CR 131, 208 P. 1055, 21 Okla. Crim. 402, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-state-oklacrimapp-1922.