James v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

James v. State

9 N.E.3d 1060, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1401

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 28, 2014·No. 2014-0318·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Clark App. No. 2013-CA-28, 2014-Ohio-140. Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in the case, the court accepts the appeal. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and this cause is remanded for application of Mansaray v. State, 138 Ohio St.3d 277, 2014-Ohio-0750.

[1402] O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark App. No. 2013-CA-28, 2014-Ohio-140. Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in the case, the court accepts the appeal. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and this cause is remanded for application of Mansaray v. State, 138 Ohio St.3d 277, 2014-Ohio-0750.

[1402] O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

James v. State, 9 N.E.3d 1060, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1401 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

9 N.E.3d 1060 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related