James v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

James v. State

179 S.E. 590, 51 Ga. App. 97, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 575

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 8, 1935

Docket24648

StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.E. 590 (James v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. State, 179 S.E. 590, 51 Ga. App. 97, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 575 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Guekry, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of simple larceny, under an indictment accusing him jointly with another. This court is unable, after a careful reading of the evidence, to say that there was not sufficient evidence to support the verdict. The trial judge having overruled the motion for a new trial, this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guekry, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of simple larceny, under an indictment accusing him jointly with another. This court is unable, after a careful reading of the evidence, to say that there was not sufficient evidence to support the verdict. The trial judge having overruled the motion for a new trial, this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.E. 590, 51 Ga. App. 97, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-state-gactapp-1935.