James v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

James v. State

198 Ga. 426

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 7, 1944·No. No. 14984·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, Presiding Justice.

The defendant having been convicted of murder without recommendation, and the only exception being on the general grounds, and the evidence amply supporting the verdict, the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Thomas E. Dawson and Donald II. Fraser, for plaintiff in error. T. Grady Head, attorney-general, B. L. Dawson, solicitor-general, and Victor Davidson, assistant attorney-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, Presiding Justice.

The defendant having been convicted of murder without recommendation, and the only exception being on the general grounds, and the evidence amply supporting the verdict, the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Thomas E. Dawson and Donald II. Fraser, for plaintiff in error. T. Grady Head, attorney-general, B. L. Dawson, solicitor-general, and Victor Davidson, assistant attorney-general, contra.

James v. State, 198 Ga. 426 (Ga. 1944).

Pincite

198 Ga. 426 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.