James v. State

174 S.E. 237, 178 Ga. 761, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 170
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 12, 1934
DocketNo. 10103
StatusPublished

This text of 174 S.E. 237 (James v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. State, 174 S.E. 237, 178 Ga. 761, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 170 (Ga. 1934).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. The judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a change of venue.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

[762]*762No. 10103. April 12, 1934.

3. Only one of the special grounds is approved by tlie trial judge, and all are mere elabarations of the general grounds, and nothing contained in any of them requires the grant of a new trial.

4. The court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. B. C. Scott and Sam Kimzey, for plaintiff in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, Clifford Pratt, solicitor-general, B. D. Murphy, J. T. Goree, J. B. G. Logan, and Jones Gñffin, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 S.E. 237, 178 Ga. 761, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-state-ga-1934.