James v. State
This text of 51 S.E. 577 (James v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The evidence for the State, if credible, warranted a verdict for murder. The evidence for the accused and his statement, if believed, showed complete justification. There was nothing in the evidence or the statement of the accused, considered separately or together, tending [549]*549to show, or from which the jury could legitimately infer,-that the homicide was voluntary manslaughter. It was therefore error to give in charge the law relating to voluntary manslaughter, and a verdict finding the accused guilty of that offense was without evidence to support it. McBeth v. State, 122 Ga. 737.
2. Neither was there anything in the evidence or the statement of the accused to support the theory of mutual combat. Accordingly it was error to give in charge section 73 of the Penal Code. See Jordan v. State, 117 Ga. 405, and cit.
3. The court did not err in admitting or excluding evidence.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 S.E. 577, 123 Ga. 548, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-state-ga-1905.