James v. State

518 So. 2d 984, 1988 WL 3354
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2627
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 21, 1988·No. No. 86-2511·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Henriquez v. State, 513 So.2d 1285 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Because appellant’s issue concerning court costs has recently been decided adversely to him, Barker v. State, 518 So.2d 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), wherein we certified a question of great public importance to our supreme court, we certify the same question in this case.

DANAHY, C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur. SCHOONOVER, J., specially concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. State, 518 So. 2d 984, 1988 WL 3354 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

518 So. 2d 984 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Henriquez v. State
513 So. 2d 1285 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Barker v. State
518 So. 2d 450 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)