James v. State

364 So. 2d 729, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16873
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 9, 1977·No. No. 77-562·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, the present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975) requires. Brooks v. State, 349 [730]*730So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Therefore, we remand the case for correction of sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

GRIMES, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. State, 364 So. 2d 729, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16873 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

364 So. 2d 729 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Napoles v. State
470 So. 2d 72 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)