James v. State
This text of 48 Fla. Supp. 2d 77 (James v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
The trial court granted a Motion in Limine excluding appellant’s [78]*78driving record upon a stipulation between the state and defense that appellant’s driver’s license was revoked. The only issue was whether appellant was driving. The order was violated by a state’s witness. Both the witness and the prosecutor should have known that the testimony would have been objectionable even without a motion in limine.
Nevertheless, based on the record before us, we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion by denying appellant’s motion for mistrial. Therefore, the decision is AFFIRMED. McNEAL, R., BOOTH, J., SINGELTARY, G., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 Fla. Supp. 2d 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-state-flacirct-1991.