James v. State ex rel. Shlasar

3 Md. 211
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 15, 1852
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Md. 211 (James v. State ex rel. Shlasar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. State ex rel. Shlasar, 3 Md. 211 (Md. 1852).

Opinion

Mason, J.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

In this case the plaintiff declared generally upon a constable’s bond, without assigning in his declaration any breaches of its condition. The defendants demurred to the declara[212]*212tion, and in argument contended, that it is defective, because it does not set out the cause of action — in other words, because it does not assign the breaches .of the condition of the bond of which he complains.

This is the identical question raised and decided in the case of Scott vs. the State, use of Ducker, 2 Maryland Rep., 284.

For the reasons assigned in that case, we think the county court were right in overruling the present demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. State
2 Md. 284 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1852)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Md. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-state-ex-rel-shlasar-md-1852.