James v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

James v. State

127 So. 922, 23 Ala. App. 644

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 Ala. App. 183 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 4, 1930·No. 7 Div. 586.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The point of decision involved upon this appeal is the action of the court in overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial. We discover no error in this connection. The evidence tended to show that this appellant was in possession óf a fruit can or jar of corn whisky. He testified he was not. This conflict in the evidence made a jury question. We think the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The point of decision involved upon this appeal is the action of the court in overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial. We discover no error in this connection. The evidence tended to show that this appellant was in possession óf a fruit can or jar of corn whisky. He testified he was not. This conflict in the evidence made a jury question. We think the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

Affirmed.

James v. State, 127 So. 922, 23 Ala. App. 644 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

127 So. 922 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.