James v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

James v. State

127 So. 922, 23 Ala. App. 644

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 4, 1930

Docket7 Div. 586.

StatusPublished

This text of 127 So. 922 (James v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. State, 127 So. 922, 23 Ala. App. 644 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The point of decision involved upon this appeal is the action of the court in overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial. We discover no error in this connection. The evidence tended to show that this appellant was in possession óf a fruit can or jar of corn whisky. He testified he was not. This conflict in the evidence made a jury question. We think the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The point of decision involved upon this appeal is the action of the court in overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial. We discover no error in this connection. The evidence tended to show that this appellant was in possession óf a fruit can or jar of corn whisky. He testified he was not. This conflict in the evidence made a jury question. We think the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 So. 922, 23 Ala. App. 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-state-alactapp-1930.